The vehicle routing problem (VRP) finds a minimum-cost routing of a fixed number of vehicles to service the demands of a set of customers. Define a set of customers, and a demand, , for each customer c. Let be the set of nodes, including the vehicle depot, which are designated as node . Let be the set of arcs, be the set of vehicles (each of which has capacity ), and be the travel time from node i to node j.
Let be a binary variable that, if set to 1, indicates that node i is visited by vehicle k. Let be a binary variable that, if set to 1, indicates that arc is traversed by vehicle k, and let be a continuous variable that denotes the amount of product (flow) on arc that is carried by vehicle k.
A VRP can be formulated as a MILP as follows:
In this formulation, the Assignment constraints ensure that each customer is serviced by at least one vehicle. The objective function ensures that there exists an optimal solution that never assigns a customer to more than one vehicle. The LeaveNode and EnterNode constraints enforce the condition that if node i is visited by vehicle k, then vehicle k must use exactly one arc that enters node i and one arc that leaves node i. Conversely, if node i is not visited by vehicle k, then no arcs that enter or leave node i can be used by vehicle k. The FlowBalance constraints define flow conservation at each node for each vehicle. That is, if a node i is visited by vehicle k, then the amount of product from vehicle k that enters and leaves that node must equal the demand at that node. Conversely, if node i is not visited by vehicle k, then the amount of product from vehicle k that enters and leaves that node must be 0. The VehicleCapacity constraints enforce the condition that the amount of product in each vehicle must always be less than or equal to the vehicle capacity . Finally, the Depot constraints enforce the condition that each vehicle must start and end at the depot node.
In this formulation, the vehicle identifier is arbitrary. Consider a decomposition by vehicle, where the Assignment constraints form the master problem and all other constraints form identical routing subproblems. As described in the section Special Case: Identical Blocks and Ryan-Foster Branching, this is a situation in which an aggregate formulation can greatly improve performance by reducing symmetry. Because you know that there exists an optimal solution that satisfies the master Assignment constraints at equality, you can force the use of Ryan-Foster branching by specifying the option VARSEL=RYANFOSTER.
VRPLIB, located at http://www.coin-or.org/SYMPHONY/branchandcut/VRP/data/index.htm, is a set of benchmark instances of the VRP. The following data set, vrpdata
, represents an instance from VRPLIB that has 22 nodes and eight vehicles (P-n22-k8.vrp), which was originally described in
Augerat et al. (1995). The data set lists each node, its coordinates, and its demand.
/* number of vehicles available */ %let num_vehicles = 8; /* capacity of each vehicle */ %let capacity = 3000; /* node, x coordinate, y coordinate, demand */ data vrpdata; input node x y demand; datalines; 1 145 215 0 2 151 264 1100 3 159 261 700 4 130 254 800 5 128 252 1400 6 163 247 2100 7 146 246 400 8 161 242 800 9 142 239 100 10 163 236 500 11 148 232 600 12 128 231 1200 13 156 217 1300 14 129 214 1300 15 146 208 300 16 164 208 900 17 141 206 2100 18 147 193 1000 19 164 193 900 20 129 189 2500 21 155 185 1800 22 139 182 700 ;
The following PROC OPTMODEL statements read in the data, declare the optimization model, and use the decomposition algorithm to solve it:
proc optmodel; /* read the node location and demand data */ set NODES; num x {NODES}; num y {NODES}; num demand {NODES}; num capacity = &capacity; num num_vehicles = &num_vehicles; read data vrpdata into NODES=[node] x y demand; set ARCS = {i in NODES, j in NODES: i ne j}; set VEHICLES = 1..num_vehicles; /* define the depot as node 1 */ num depot = 1; /* define the arc cost as the rounded Euclidean distance */ num cost {<i,j> in ARCS} = round(sqrt((x[i]-x[j])^2 + (y[i]-y[j])^2)); /* Flow[i,j,k] is the amount of demand carried on arc (i,j) by vehicle k */ var Flow {ARCS, VEHICLES} >= 0 <= capacity; /* UseNode[i,k] = 1, if and only if node i is serviced by vehicle k */ var UseNode {NODES, VEHICLES} binary; /* UseArc[i,j,k] = 1, if and only if arc (i,j) is traversed by vehicle k */ var UseArc {ARCS, VEHICLES} binary; /* minimize the total distance traversed */ min TotalCost = sum {<i,j> in ARCS, k in VEHICLES} cost[i,j] * UseArc[i,j,k]; /* each non-depot node must be serviced by at least one vehicle */ con Assignment {i in NODES diff {depot}}: sum {k in VEHICLES} UseNode[i,k] >= 1; /* each vehicle must start at the depot node */ for{k in VEHICLES} fix UseNode[depot,k] = 1; /* some vehicle k traverses an arc that leaves node i if and only if UseNode[i,k] = 1 */ con LeaveNode {i in NODES, k in VEHICLES}: sum {<(i),j> in ARCS} UseArc[i,j,k] = UseNode[i,k]; /* some vehicle k traverses an arc that enters node i if and only if UseNode[i,k] = 1 */ con EnterNode {i in NODES, k in VEHICLES}: sum {<j,(i)> in ARCS} UseArc[j,i,k] = UseNode[i,k]; /* the amount of demand supplied by vehicle k to node i must equal demand if UseNode[i,k] = 1; otherwise, it must equal 0 */ con FlowBalance {i in NODES diff {depot}, k in VEHICLES}: sum {<j,(i)> in ARCS} Flow[j,i,k] - sum {<(i),j> in ARCS} Flow[i,j,k] = demand[i] * UseNode[i,k]; /* if UseArc[i,j,k] = 1, then the flow on arc (i,j) must be at most capacity if UseArc[i,j,k] = 0, then no flow is allowed on arc (i,j) */ con VehicleCapacity {<i,j> in ARCS, k in VEHICLES}: Flow[i,j,k] <= Flow[i,j,k].ub * UseArc[i,j,k]; /* decomp by vehicle */ for {i in NODES, k in VEHICLES} do; LeaveNode[i,k].block = k; EnterNode[i,k].block = k; end; for {i in NODES diff {depot}, k in VEHICLES} FlowBalance[i,k].block = k; for {<i,j> in ARCS, k in VEHICLES} VehicleCapacity[i,j,k].block = k; /* solve using decomp (aggregate formulation) */ solve with MILP / varsel=ryanfoster decomp=(logfreq=20);
The following OPTMODEL statements create node and edge data for the optimal routing:
/* create solution data set */ str color {k in VEHICLES} = ['red' 'green' 'blue' 'black' 'orange' 'gray' 'maroon' 'purple']; create data node_data from [i] x y; create data edge_data from [i j k]= {<i,j> in ARCS, k in VEHICLES: UseArc[i,j,k].sol > 0.5} x1=x[i] y1=y[i] x2=x[j] y2=y[j] linecolor=color[k]; quit;
The solution summary is displayed in Output 15.8.1.
Output 15.8.1: Solution Summary
Solution Summary | |
---|---|
Solver | MILP |
Algorithm | Decomposition |
Objective Function | TotalCost |
Solution Status | Optimal |
Objective Value | 603 |
Relative Gap | 0 |
Absolute Gap | 0 |
Primal Infeasibility | 7.123635E-12 |
Bound Infeasibility | 0 |
Integer Infeasibility | 2.331468E-15 |
Best Bound | 603 |
Nodes | 1 |
Iterations | 69 |
Presolve Time | 0.60 |
Solution Time | 90.35 |
The iteration log is displayed in Output 15.8.2.
Output 15.8.2: Log
NOTE: There were 22 observations read from the data set WORK.VRPDATA. |
NOTE: Problem generation will use 4 threads. |
NOTE: The problem has 7568 variables (0 free, 8 fixed). |
NOTE: The problem has 3872 binary and 0 integer variables. |
NOTE: The problem has 4237 linear constraints (3696 LE, 520 EQ, 21 GE, 0 range). |
NOTE: The problem has 22528 linear constraint coefficients. |
NOTE: The problem has 0 nonlinear constraints (0 LE, 0 EQ, 0 GE, 0 range). |
NOTE: The MILP presolver value AUTOMATIC is applied. |
NOTE: The MILP presolver removed 8 variables and 0 constraints. |
NOTE: The MILP presolver removed 16 constraint coefficients. |
NOTE: The MILP presolver modified 0 constraint coefficients. |
NOTE: The presolved problem has 7560 variables, 4237 constraints, and 22512 constraint |
coefficients. |
NOTE: The MILP solver is called. |
NOTE: The Decomposition algorithm is used. |
NOTE: The Decomposition algorithm is executing in single-machine mode. |
NOTE: The DECOMP method value USER is applied. |
NOTE: All blocks are identical and the master model is set covering. |
WARNING: The master model is not a set partitioning and VARSEL=RYANFOSTER. The objective |
function must ensure that there exists at least one optimal solution that fulfills all |
of the master constraints at equality. |
NOTE: The Decomposition algorithm is using an aggregate formulation and Ryan-Foster branching. |
NOTE: The problem has a decomposable structure with 8 blocks. The largest block covers 12.44% |
of the constraints in the problem. |
NOTE: The decomposition subproblems cover 7560 (100.00%) variables and 4216 (99.50%) |
constraints. |
NOTE: The deterministic parallel mode is enabled. |
NOTE: The Decomposition algorithm is using up to 4 threads. |
Iter Best Master Best LP IP CPU Real |
Bound Objective Integer Gap Gap Time Time |
NOTE: Starting phase 1. |
1 0.0000 20.0000 . 2.00e+01 . 0 0 |
20 0.0000 0.6364 . 6.36e-01 . 4 3 |
27 0.0000 0.0000 . 0.00% . 5 5 |
NOTE: Starting phase 2. |
28 112.0000 959.0455 . 756.29% . 14 8 |
35 112.0000 807.0000 807.0000 620.54% 620.54% 21 12 |
38 112.0000 691.0000 691.0000 516.96% 516.96% 25 14 |
. 112.0000 691.0000 691.0000 516.96% 516.96% 26 15 |
40 112.0000 691.0000 691.0000 516.96% 516.96% 28 17 |
42 235.0000 691.0000 691.0000 194.04% 194.04% 35 21 |
44 247.0000 691.0000 691.0000 179.76% 179.76% 41 24 |
46 251.0000 691.0000 691.0000 175.30% 175.30% 45 26 |
. 251.0000 651.0000 651.0000 159.36% 159.36% 54 32 |
52 264.0000 648.0000 648.0000 145.45% 145.45% 58 34 |
54 310.6667 625.3333 648.0000 101.29% 108.58% 66 39 |
55 403.6000 613.2000 648.0000 51.93% 60.56% 70 41 |
57 410.0000 613.2000 648.0000 49.56% 58.05% 77 47 |
. 410.0000 607.6667 614.0000 48.21% 49.76% 80 49 |
60 471.6667 607.6667 614.0000 28.83% 30.18% 83 51 |
62 511.8148 606.6296 614.0000 18.53% 19.97% 91 56 |
63 553.3333 604.0000 604.0000 9.16% 9.16% 96 60 |
64 564.0000 604.0000 604.0000 7.09% 7.09% 104 63 |
65 588.0000 604.0000 604.0000 2.72% 2.72% 119 69 |
66 589.1667 603.8333 604.0000 2.49% 2.52% 132 74 |
67 597.1667 603.8333 604.0000 1.12% 1.14% 145 79 |
68 600.3333 603.0000 603.0000 0.44% 0.44% 157 83 |
69 603.0000 603.0000 603.0000 0.00% 0.00% 172 89 |
Node Active Sols Best Best Gap CPU Real |
Integer Bound Time Time |
0 0 9 603.0000 603.0000 0.00% 172 89 |
NOTE: The Decomposition algorithm used 4 threads. |
NOTE: The Decomposition algorithm time is 89.73 seconds. |
NOTE: Optimal. |
NOTE: Objective = 603. |
NOTE: The data set WORK.NODE_DATA has 22 observations and 3 variables. |
NOTE: The data set WORK.EDGE_DATA has 29 observations and 8 variables. |
The following DATA step and call to PROC SGPLOT generate a plot of the optimal routing. The plot is displayed in Output 15.8.3.
data sganno(drop=i j); retain drawspace "datavalue" linethickness 1; set edge_data; function = 'line'; run; proc sgplot data=node_data sganno=sganno; scatter x=x y=y / datalabel=i; xaxis display=none; yaxis display=none; run;