A market research firm conducts a survey among undergraduate students at a certain university to evaluate three new Web designs for a commercial Web site targeting undergraduate students at the university.
The sample design is a stratified sample where the strata are students’ classes. Within each class, 300 students are randomly selected by using simple random sampling without replacement. The total number of students in each class in the fall semester of 2001 is shown in the following table:
Class |
Enrollment |
---|---|
1 - Freshman |
3,734 |
2 - Sophomore |
3,565 |
3 - Junior |
3,903 |
4 - Senior |
4,196 |
This total enrollment information is saved in the SAS data set Enrollment
by using the following SAS statements:
proc format; value Class 1='Freshman' 2='Sophomore' 3='Junior' 4='Senior'; run; data Enrollment; format Class Class.; input Class _TOTAL_; datalines; 1 3734 2 3565 3 3903 4 4196 ;
In the data set Enrollment
, the variable _TOTAL_
contains the enrollment figures for all classes. They are also the population size for each stratum in this example.
Each student selected in the sample evaluates one randomly selected Web design by using the following scale:
1 |
Dislike very much |
2 |
Dislike |
3 |
Neutral |
4 |
Like |
5 |
Like very much |
The survey results are collected and shown in the following table, with the three different Web designs coded as A, B, and C.
Evaluation of New Web Designs |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating Counts |
||||||
Strata |
Design |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Freshman |
A |
10 |
34 |
35 |
16 |
15 |
B |
5 |
6 |
24 |
30 |
25 |
|
C |
11 |
14 |
20 |
34 |
21 |
|
Sophomore |
A |
19 |
12 |
26 |
18 |
25 |
B |
10 |
18 |
32 |
23 |
26 |
|
C |
15 |
22 |
34 |
9 |
20 |
|
Junior |
A |
8 |
21 |
23 |
26 |
22 |
B |
1 |
4 |
15 |
33 |
47 |
|
C |
16 |
19 |
30 |
23 |
12 |
|
Senior |
A |
11 |
14 |
24 |
33 |
18 |
B |
8 |
15 |
25 |
30 |
22 |
|
C |
2 |
34 |
30 |
18 |
16 |
The survey results are stored in a SAS data set WebSurvey
by using the following SAS statements:
proc format; value Design 1='A' 2='B' 3='C'; value Rating 1='dislike very much' 2='dislike' 3='neutral' 4='like' 5='like very much'; run; data WebSurvey; format Class Class. Design Design. Rating Rating.; do Class=1 to 4; do Design=1 to 3; do Rating=1 to 5; input Count @@; output; end; end; end; datalines; 10 34 35 16 15 8 21 23 26 22 5 10 24 30 21 1 14 25 23 37 11 14 20 34 21 16 19 30 23 12 19 12 26 18 25 11 14 24 33 18 10 18 32 23 17 8 15 35 30 12 15 22 34 9 20 2 34 30 18 16 ; data WebSurvey; set WebSurvey; if Class=1 then Weight=3734/300; if Class=2 then Weight=3565/300; if Class=3 then Weight=3903/300; if Class=4 then Weight=4196/300; run;
The data set WebSurvey
contains the variables Class
, Design
, Rating
, Count
, and Weight
. The variable class
is the stratum variable, with four strata: freshman, sophomore, junior, and senior. The variable Design
specifies the three new Web designs: A, B, and C. The variable Rating
contains students’ evaluations of the new Web designs. The variable counts
gives the frequency with which each Web design received each rating within each stratum. The variable weight
contains the sampling weights, which are the reciprocals of selection probabilities in this example.
Output 95.1.1 shows the first 20 observations of the data set.
Output 95.1.1: Web Design Survey Sample (First 20 Observations)
Obs | Class | Design | Rating | Count | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Freshman | A | dislike very much | 10 | 12.4467 |
2 | Freshman | A | dislike | 34 | 12.4467 |
3 | Freshman | A | neutral | 35 | 12.4467 |
4 | Freshman | A | like | 16 | 12.4467 |
5 | Freshman | A | like very much | 15 | 12.4467 |
6 | Freshman | B | dislike very much | 8 | 12.4467 |
7 | Freshman | B | dislike | 21 | 12.4467 |
8 | Freshman | B | neutral | 23 | 12.4467 |
9 | Freshman | B | like | 26 | 12.4467 |
10 | Freshman | B | like very much | 22 | 12.4467 |
11 | Freshman | C | dislike very much | 5 | 12.4467 |
12 | Freshman | C | dislike | 10 | 12.4467 |
13 | Freshman | C | neutral | 24 | 12.4467 |
14 | Freshman | C | like | 30 | 12.4467 |
15 | Freshman | C | like very much | 21 | 12.4467 |
16 | Sophomore | A | dislike very much | 1 | 11.8833 |
17 | Sophomore | A | dislike | 14 | 11.8833 |
18 | Sophomore | A | neutral | 25 | 11.8833 |
19 | Sophomore | A | like | 23 | 11.8833 |
20 | Sophomore | A | like very much | 37 | 11.8833 |
The following SAS statements perform the logistic regression:
proc surveylogistic data=WebSurvey total=Enrollment; stratum Class; freq Count; class Design; model Rating (order=internal) = design; weight Weight; run;
The PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC statement invokes the procedure. The TOTAL= option specifies the data set Enrollment
, which contains the population totals in the strata. The population totals are used to calculate the finite population correction
factor in the variance estimates. The response variable Rating
is in the ordinal scale. A cumulative logit model is used to investigate the responses to the Web designs. In the MODEL statement,
rating
is the response variable, and Design
is the effect in the regression model. The ORDER=INTERNAL option is used for the response variable Rating
to sort the ordinal response levels of Rating
by its internal (numerical) values rather than by the formatted values (for example, 'like very much'). Because the sample
design involves stratified simple random sampling, the STRATA statement is used to specify the stratification variable Class
. The WEIGHT statement specifies the variable Weight
for sampling weights.
The sample and analysis summary is shown in Output 95.1.2. There are five response levels for the Rating
, with 'dislike very much' as the lowest ordered value. The regression model is modeling lower cumulative probabilities by
using logit as the link function. Because the TOTAL= option is used, the finite population correction is included in the variance
estimation. The sampling weight is also used in the analysis.
Output 95.1.2: Web Design Survey, Model Information
Model Information | |
---|---|
Data Set | WORK.WEBSURVEY |
Response Variable | Rating |
Number of Response Levels | 5 |
Frequency Variable | Count |
Stratum Variable | Class |
Number of Strata | 4 |
Weight Variable | Weight |
Model | Cumulative Logit |
Optimization Technique | Fisher's Scoring |
Variance Adjustment | Degrees of Freedom (DF) |
Finite Population Correction | Used |
Response Profile | |||
---|---|---|---|
Ordered Value |
Rating | Total Frequency |
Total Weight |
1 | dislike very much | 116 | 1489.0733 |
2 | dislike | 227 | 2933.0433 |
3 | neutral | 338 | 4363.3767 |
4 | like | 283 | 3606.8067 |
5 | like very much | 236 | 3005.7000 |
Probabilities modeled are cumulated over the lower Ordered Values. |
In Output 95.1.3, the score chi-square for testing the proportional odds assumption is 98.1957, which is highly significant. This indicates that the cumulative logit model might not adequately fit the data.
Output 95.1.3: Web Design Survey, Testing the Proportional Odds Assumption
Score Test for the Proportional Odds Assumption |
||
---|---|---|
Chi-Square | DF | Pr > ChiSq |
98.1957 | 6 | <.0001 |
An alternative model is to use the generalized logit model with the LINK=GLOGIT option, as shown in the following SAS statements:
proc surveylogistic data=WebSurvey total=Enrollment; stratum Class; freq Count; class Design; model Rating (ref='neutral') = Design /link=glogit; weight Weight; run;
The REF='neutral' option is used for the response variable Rating
to indicate that all other response levels are referenced to the level 'neutral.' The option LINK=GLOGIT option requests
that the procedure fit a generalized logit model.
The summary of the analysis is shown in Output 95.1.4, which indicates that the generalized logit model is used in the analysis.
Output 95.1.4: Web Design Survey, Model Information
Model Information | |
---|---|
Data Set | WORK.WEBSURVEY |
Response Variable | Rating |
Number of Response Levels | 5 |
Frequency Variable | Count |
Stratum Variable | Class |
Number of Strata | 4 |
Weight Variable | Weight |
Model | Generalized Logit |
Optimization Technique | Newton-Raphson |
Variance Adjustment | Degrees of Freedom (DF) |
Finite Population Correction | Used |
Response Profile | |||
---|---|---|---|
Ordered Value |
Rating | Total Frequency |
Total Weight |
1 | dislike | 227 | 2933.0433 |
2 | dislike very much | 116 | 1489.0733 |
3 | like | 283 | 3606.8067 |
4 | like very much | 236 | 3005.7000 |
5 | neutral | 338 | 4363.3767 |
Logits modeled use Rating='neutral' as the reference category. |
Output 95.1.5 shows the parameterization for the main effect Design
.
Output 95.1.5: Web Design Survey, Class Level Information
Class Level Information | |||
---|---|---|---|
Class | Value | Design Variables | |
Design | A | 1 | 0 |
B | 0 | 1 | |
C | -1 | -1 |
The parameter and odds ratio estimates are shown in Output 95.1.6. For each odds ratio estimate, the 95% confidence limits shown in the table contain the value 1.0. Therefore, no conclusion about which Web design is preferred can be made based on this survey.
Output 95.1.6: Web Design Survey, Parameter and Odds Ratio Estimates
Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | Rating | DF | Estimate | Standard Error |
Wald Chi-Square |
Pr > ChiSq | |
Intercept | dislike | 1 | -0.3964 | 0.0832 | 22.7100 | <.0001 | |
Intercept | dislike very much | 1 | -1.0826 | 0.1045 | 107.3889 | <.0001 | |
Intercept | like | 1 | -0.1892 | 0.0780 | 5.8888 | 0.0152 | |
Intercept | like very much | 1 | -0.3767 | 0.0824 | 20.9223 | <.0001 | |
Design | A | dislike | 1 | -0.0942 | 0.1166 | 0.6518 | 0.4195 |
Design | A | dislike very much | 1 | -0.0647 | 0.1469 | 0.1940 | 0.6596 |
Design | A | like | 1 | -0.1370 | 0.1104 | 1.5400 | 0.2146 |
Design | A | like very much | 1 | 0.0446 | 0.1130 | 0.1555 | 0.6933 |
Design | B | dislike | 1 | 0.0391 | 0.1201 | 0.1057 | 0.7451 |
Design | B | dislike very much | 1 | 0.2721 | 0.1448 | 3.5294 | 0.0603 |
Design | B | like | 1 | 0.1669 | 0.1102 | 2.2954 | 0.1298 |
Design | B | like very much | 1 | 0.1420 | 0.1174 | 1.4641 | 0.2263 |
Odds Ratio Estimates | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Effect | Rating | Point Estimate | 95% Wald Confidence Limits |
|
Design A vs C | dislike | 0.861 | 0.583 | 1.272 |
Design A vs C | dislike very much | 1.153 | 0.692 | 1.923 |
Design A vs C | like | 0.899 | 0.618 | 1.306 |
Design A vs C | like very much | 1.260 | 0.851 | 1.865 |
Design B vs C | dislike | 0.984 | 0.659 | 1.471 |
Design B vs C | dislike very much | 1.615 | 0.975 | 2.675 |
Design B vs C | like | 1.218 | 0.838 | 1.768 |
Design B vs C | like very much | 1.389 | 0.925 | 2.086 |